What are Schools For – Employing Adults or Teaching Kids?

Facebook Twitter Pinterest Plusone Linkedin Stumbleupon Email

Could we please, PLEASE stop talking about the budget?

This is my first blog post ever… not to say I have not thought about it A LOT…as you all know there comes a point where you must make the leap from thought to action, so here goes…

I recently accepted the position of Executive Director of Jeffco Students First (another leap from thought to action), a foundation dedicated to the notion that we can aim higher when it comes to public education.  While it is a great thing that Jefferson County Public Schools perform well on a relative basis, a countywide 10th grade math proficiency of just 42% is not good enough, particularly in light of the constant calls for more money.

For the past six months, I have been consumed with reading about school reform, listening to panels of experts, attending school board meetings and studying our district’s financials.  I have concluded that the district has not experienced significant cuts in revenue or spending. Just looking at the General Fund expenses published in the district Annual Report, for the 2004/05 school year the district spent $511M and in 2010/11 they spent $601M.  This equates to a year over year increase in spending of $90M or a cumulative $450M over the six years.  At the same time, enrollment has remained flat.   How can anyone say, with a straight face, that we have experienced “severe cuts”?

There is not one study that I have come across that definitively links greater school spending with greater academic achievement and that is really what this is all about – greater academic achievement.

For all the hours and hours and HOURS of talk about budgeting and spending, I would like to see half the effort devoted to achievement.  A panel I recently attended boiled the debate between “spending” and “reform” down to a chicken or egg scenario – we simply need to answer “which comes first?”.  Now, call me crazy, but from what I can tell – THERE IS NO MORE MONEY – so, perhaps we should focus on the reform piece.

You would think everyone would be on board at the prospect of applying proven reforms given the amazing outcomes that have been achieved all over the country – think Harlem Academy, and KIPP Charter schools, or even right in our own backyard. Dennison Elementary and D’Evelyn Middle and High School have developed a rigorous curriculum and set exceptionally high expectations, which their students meet.  Alas, not everyone is on board – there exist interest groups that gain more from maintaining the status quo than from improving student achievement.

My goal is to inform Jeffco parents and taxpayers about the structural challenges within the system that impede higher student achievement and let them decide if they wish to spend ever more money on the parts that are not working for our children.

Facebook Twitter Pinterest Plusone Linkedin Stumbleupon Email

Related posts:

5 Responses to What are Schools For – Employing Adults or Teaching Kids?

  • Satchel says:

    Great first post! I homeschool my kids, who are a couple years ahead of their age groups’ “normal” achievement standards set by Jeffco. We spend a grand total of MAYBE $300 a year on school stuff. Money does NOT educate kids. We just had dinner with our friends who sent their kids through the D’Evelyn program (their kids are all either PhDs or close to). For a public school model, clearly the D’Evylyn program should be used as a model.

  • Joy Overbeck
    Joy says:

    When I was the education reporter at the Vail Daily I did the same reserach you did and found that for all the “educators” ranting about needing more $$ because then tehy could get classroom size smaller, the reserach shows that unless classrooms are down 12 kids it just doesn’t matter! ALSO the highest performing school in the district was the public charter school but the school board completely refused to duplicate their methods in the other schools — in fact, CUT their budget! Nuts. We keep throwing money at these people and it just goes to pay more admin. costs, not educate our kids. “Educators” must be evaluated and given merit pay like anybody in any profession — why are they special and exempt? Then the unions have to let us fire the worst ones. This is the only way to get the best teachers for our failing kids — it has nothing to do with money, it’s just common sense!

  • Kendall Bailey says:

    I am interested in your your findings. As a supporter of ACE, it’s important to stay informed. Are you planning to attend our annual luncheon with Jeb Bush as keynote speaker on May 29th. Michelle Rhee was our speaker last year. Thanks for your service!

  • John says:

    What was the name of the highest performing school? Thanks!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>